Problems

Age
Difficulty
Found: 1822

Let’s prove that 1 is the largest natural number.
Let n be the largest natural number. Then, n2, being a natural number, is less than or equal to n. Therefore n2n=n(n1)0. Hence, 0n1. Therefore n=1.

Find the mistake in the sequence of equalities: 1=(1)22=((1)2)12=112=1.

Theorem: If we mark n points on a circle and connect each point to every other point by a straight line, the lines divide the interior of the circle is into is 2n1 regions.
"Proof": First, let’s have a look at the smallest natural numbers.

  • When n=1 there is one region (the whole disc).

  • When n=2 there are two regions (two half-discs).

  • When n=3 there are 4 regions (three lune-like regions and one triangle in the middle).

  • When n=4 there are 8 regions, and if you’re still not convinced then try n=5 and you’ll find 16 regions if you count carefully.

Our proof in general will be by induction on n. Assuming the theorem is true for n points, consider a circle with n+1 points on it. Connecting n of them together in pairs produces 2n1 regions in the disc, and then connecting the remaining point to all the others will divide the previous regions into two parts, thereby giving us 2×(2n1)=2n regions.

Let’s "prove" that the number 1 is a multiple of 3. We will use the symbol to denote "congruent modulo 3". Thus, what we need to prove is that 10 modulo 3. Let’s see: 14 modulo 3 means that 2124 modulo 3, thus 216 modulo 3, however 16 gives the remainder 1 after division by 3, thus we get 21 modulo 3, next 2111 modulo 3, and thus 10 modulo 3. Which means that 1 is divisible by 3.

Recall that (n+1)2=n2+2n+1 and after expansion we get (n+1)2(2n+1)=n2. Subtract n(2n+1) from both sides (n+1)2(2n+1)n(2n+1)=n2n(2n+1) and rewrite it as (n+1)2(n+1)(2n+1)=n2n(2n+1).
Now we add (2n+1)24 to both sides: (n+1)2(n+1)(2n+1)+(2n+1)24=n2n(2n+1)+(2n+1)24.
Factor both sides into square: ((n+1)2n+12)2=(n2n+12)2.
Now take the square root: (n+1)2n+12=n2n+12.
Add 2n+12 to both sides and we get n+1=n which is equivalent to 1=0.

Look at the following diagram, depicting how to get an extra cell by reshaping triangle.
image
Can you find a mistake? Certainly the triangles have different area, so we cannot obtain one from the other one by reshaping.

This problem is often called "The infinite chocolate bar". Depicted below is a way to get one more piece of chocolate from the 5×6 chocolate bar. Do you see where is it wrong?
image

Consider the following "proof" that any triangle is equilateral: Given a triangle ABC, we first prove that AB=AC. First let’s draw the bisector of the angle A. Now draw the perpendicular bisector of segment BC, denote by D the middle of BC and by O the intersection of these lines. See the diagram
image
Draw the lines OR perpendicular to AB and OQ perpendicular to AC. Draw lines OB and OC. Then the triangles, RAO and QAO are equal, since we have equal angles ORA=OQA=90°, and RAO=QAO, and the common side AO. On the other hand the triangles ROB and QOC are also equal since the angles BRO=CQO=90°, the hypotenuses BO=OC the legs RO=OQ. Thus, AR=AQ, RB=QC, and AB=AR+RB=AQ+QC=AC. Q.E.D.

As a corollary, one can show that all the triangles are equilateral, by showing that AB=BC in the same way.

Let’s prove the following statement: every graph without isolated vertices is connected.
Proof We use the induction on the number of vertices. Clearly the statement is true for graphs with 2 vertices. Now, assume we have proven the statement for graphs with up to n vertices.
Take a graph with n vertices by induction hypothesis it must be connected. Let’s add a non-isolated vertex to it. As this vertex is not isolated, it is connected to one of the other n vertices. But then the whole graph of n+1 vertices is connected!

Let’s compute the infinite sum: 1+2+4+8+16+...+2n+...=c Observe that 1+2+4+8+...=1+2(1+2+4+8+16+...), namely c=1+2c, then it follows that c=1+2+4+8+...=1.